Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/integrity |
| dct:title | Integrity |
| dct:description | (Statement) Integrity ensures that data and digital public services are accurate, consistent, and trustworthy throughout their lifecycle. This principle emphasises the importance of maintaining the reliability and authenticity of information and services provided by public administrations. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Integrity is fundamental to the trustworthiness and effectiveness of data-driven services and digital public solutions. Ensuring data integrity involves implementing controls that prevent unauthorised alterations, corruption, or loss of data. This principle supports informed decision-making, enhances operational efficiency, and maintains public trust. By embedding integrity controls into the design and implementation of digital public services, organisations can safeguard the accuracy and reliability of their information, thereby ensuring that services are delivered effectively and securely. This approach also helps in complying with legal and regulatory requirements, reducing the risk of data breaches and other security incidents. |
| dct:description | (Implications) Implementing integrity in digital public services requires a comprehensive approach that ensures data remains accurate, consistent, and unaltered throughout its lifecycle. This involves adapting the design of data-driven services to incorporate robust integrity controls, such as data validation and verification processes, to maintain data accuracy and consistency. Strict access controls must be implemented to prevent unauthorised modifications, ensuring that only authorised personnel can alter data. Additionally, encryption techniques should be used to protect data from unauthorised access and tampering. Maintaining detailed audit trails is essential for tracking data changes and ensuring accountability. Regular monitoring and audits are necessary to detect and address any integrity issues promptly. Furthermore, adhering to relevant standards and regulations is crucial to ensure data integrity and security. By adopting these measures, public administrations can enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of their digital services, ultimately improving service delivery and maintaining public trust. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Governance |
| dct:source | Security and Privacy Underlying Principle (8) of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) |
| dct:source | https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/nifo-national-interoperability-framework-observatory/2-underlying-principles-european-public-services#2.4 |
| rdfs:comment | The European Interoperability Framework is part of the Communication (COM(2017)134) from the European Commission adopted on 23 March 2017. The framework gives specific guidance on how to set up interoperable digital public services. |
| dcat:theme | Semantic IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Obligation |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | Obligation |