Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/integrated-horizontal-user-experience |
| dct:title | Integrated horizontal user experience |
| dct:description | (Statement) Users have an integrated experience of digital public services. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Users should be optimally supported in their tasks without being burdened by the complexities of multiple organisations, processes, or applications. This principle guides the analysis and design of architectural solutions to enhance the user experience when accessing and using digital public services. |
| dct:description | (Implications) Users of digital public services interact with a unified interface that seamlessly supports their tasks, creating the impression of a single cohesive application. This approach ensures that users are not confronted with redundant steps and only need to log in once to complete their tasks. By encapsulating internal complexities and preventing them from being exposed to users, the system maintains a streamlined and efficient user experience, reinforcing the perception of a singular, integrated solution. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Governance |
| dct:source | eID Building Block of DIGITAL Europe |
| dct:source | https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/sites/display/DIGITAL/What+is+eID |
| rdfs:comment | An example of integrated horizontal user experience is found in the development of eID |
| dcat:theme | Technical IoP, Organisational IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | NWS |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | Desire |