Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/separation-of-concerns |
| dct:title | Separation of concerns |
| dct:description | (Statement) Separation of concerns ensures that each building block of a solution or service has a specific scope in terms of concern and capabilities, avoiding the replication of functionalities across different components. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Implementing the principle of Separation of concerns in solutions and service development and provision is crucial for enhancing clarity, maintainability, and scalability. By clearly defining the scope and responsibilities of each component, this principle helps to reduce complexity and improve the manageability of the system. It ensures that each building block can be developed, tested, and maintained independently, leading to more modular and flexible solutions. This approach also facilitates better collaboration among teams, as responsibilities and interfaces are clearly defined, reducing the risk of overlapping functionalities and dependencies. |
| dct:description | (Implications) To effectively implement Separation of concerns, organisations must adopt a modular approach to design and development, ensuring that each component has a well-defined scope and set of responsibilities. Business processes should include clear guidelines for defining and documenting the boundaries and interfaces of each building block. Technically, solutions must be designed to support modularity and interoperability, with components that can be easily integrated and replaced without affecting the overall system. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are necessary to ensure that the separation of concerns is maintained throughout the lifecycle of the solution. Additionally, fostering a culture of collaboration and communication is essential to ensure that all stakeholders understand and adhere to the principle. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Implementation |
| dct:source | Applying the principle of separation of concerns in software development |
| dct:source | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080362366500084 |
| rdfs:comment | In the source, an article, the principle is revidsed. The principle of separation of concerns finds application to a number of aspects of software development, some well-known, such as de-coupling modules, some less well-known, such as organising case analyses. Three example applications of the principle of separation of concerns are presented, with the aim of helping the reader to apply the principle better and to find new situations in which the principle can be applied. |
| dcat:theme | Organisational IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | N/A |