Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/reuse-before-buy-before-build |
| dct:title | Reuse, before buy, before build |
| dct:description | (Statement) Existing digital systems are reused, before deciding upon buying or even building them. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Reusing existing systems, services, and solutions can lead to substantial cost savings, as the expenses associated with developing and maintaining new systems are often much higher than anticipated. This principle ensures that public administrations make efficient use of resources by leveraging existing investments and avoiding unnecessary duplication. Additionally, reusing proven solutions can enhance the reliability and interoperability of public services, as these systems have already been tested and validated in real-world scenarios. By prioritising reuse, public administrations can focus on optimising and integrating existing solutions to meet their needs, fostering innovation and improving service delivery without incurring the high costs and risks associated with building new systems from scratch. |
| dct:description | (Implications) Implementing the principle of ""Reuse, before buy, before build"" requires both business and technical considerations. Public bodies and administrations must conduct thorough assessments of existing systems, services, and solutions to determine their suitability for reuse. This involves evaluating the functionality, scalability, and interoperability of these systems to ensure they can meet current and future requirements. When existing solutions are not sufficient, the next step is to consider purchasing commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions that can be customised to fit specific needs. Building new systems should only be considered as a last resort when no existing solutions can fulfil essential requirements.From a technical perspective, public administrations must establish robust frameworks for evaluating and integrating existing systems. This includes adopting open standards and protocols to ensure interoperability, implementing secure data management practices, and maintaining comprehensive documentation to facilitate the reuse of systems. Additionally, public bodies should promote a culture of collaboration and knowledge sharing, encouraging the reuse of solutions across different departments and agencies. By following these guidelines, public administrations can achieve cost-effective, sustainable, and efficient service delivery, while minimising the risks and costs associated with developing new systems. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Governance |
| dct:source | Reusability Underlying Principle (4) of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) |
| dct:source | https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/nifo-national-interoperability-framework-observatory/glossary/term/reusability |
| rdfs:comment | The European Interoperability Framework is part of the Communication (COM(2017)134) from the European Commission adopted on 23 March 2017. The framework gives specific guidance on how to set up interoperable digital public services. |
| dcat:theme | Organisational IoP, Semantic IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | Desire |