Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/ICT-management-from-cradle-to-grave |
| dct:title | ICT management from cradle to grave |
| dct:description | (Statement) A full life cycle cost of ownership (including retirement costs) should form part of the business case. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Public administrations are the first link in the chain and need to set an example for society and businesses by managing the entire life cycle of technology products. Therefore, when planning and designing public services, this aspect needs to be included from design and implementation to retirement. Such care for the full ICT life cycle comes at a critical stage for sustainable development, amplified by the excess use of resources (economic, natural, etc.). Considering this, public administrations need to establish and use relevant policies that help ensure and control sustainability at all levels. |
| dct:description | (Implications) When implementing and retiring elements related to the provision of digital public services, public administrations shall include and create policies that ensure the lifecycle of infrastructures, applications services and equipment is considered and extended to ensure the minimum waste in terms of sustainability. An example regarding this last topic is, for instance, the application of policies to ensure that no additional costs (economic, social and environmental) rise when renewing the computer fleet. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Governance |
| dct:source | How the EU wants to achieve a circular economy by 2050 in News European Parliament |
| dct:source | https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20210128STO96607/how-the-eu-wants-to-achieve-a-circular-economy-by-2050 |
| rdfs:comment | How the EU wants to achieve a circular economy by 2050. |
| dcat:theme | Organisational IoP, Semantic IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | NWS |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | N/A |