Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/confidentiality |
| dct:title | Confidentiality |
| dct:description | (Statement) Confidentiality ensures that sensitive information is protected from unauthorised access and disclosure, maintaining trust and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Implementing Confidentiality in solution architecture is crucial for maintaining the trust of citizens and stakeholders by safeguarding sensitive information. It helps prevent data breaches and unauthorised access, which can lead to significant legal, financial, and reputational damage. Ensuring confidentiality also supports compliance with various legal and regulatory frameworks, thereby enhancing the credibility and reliability of public sector services. |
| dct:description | (Implications) To effectively implement Confidentiality, organisations must invest in robust security measures and training programmes to ensure that all personnel understand the importance of protecting sensitive information. Business processes should be designed to minimise the risk of unauthorised access, including strict access controls and regular audits. Technically, solutions must incorporate strong encryption methods for data at rest and in transit, implement secure authentication mechanisms, and ensure continuous monitoring and incident response capabilities to detect and address potential breaches promptly. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Governance |
| dct:source | NIS 2 Directive |
| dct:source | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj/eng |
| rdfs:comment | This directive establishes a high common level of cybersecurity across the EU. It mandates that essential and important entities implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to manage risks to the security of network and information systems, including the confidentiality of data. It also requires incident response capabilities, secure authentication, and encryption. |
| dcat:theme | Organisational IoP, Semantic IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Obligation |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | Obligation |