Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/proactiveness |
| dct:title | Proactiveness |
| dct:description | (Statement) Proactiveness refers to proactive services, which are public services that a public institution delivers following its own initiatives. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) European institutions and public administrations throughout Europe are reference actors and roles that can lead the environment on digital public services and the use of available data for the creation of innovative services, taking as a basis life, business events and circumstances. There is an increasing amount of data from citizens, businesses and other stakeholders that European institutions can leverage to think and create digital public services according to users' needs (citizens or businesses). |
| dct:description | (Implications) For the implementation of Proactiveness in digital public services, there are implications at various levels. At the legal level, it is essential to ensure that data is treated and managed in accordance with relevant legal clauses. At the organisational level, digital capabilities must be instantiated by services aligned with user needs and governed by agreements between parties to ensure data sovereignty. Legal interoperability requires that data is properly described and adheres to current approaches for semantic interoperability. At the technical level, it is crucial to ensure that appropriate technical applications and technology services are available to reuse and deliver these services effectively. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Strategy (Public Policy Cycle) |
| dct:source | Interoperable Europe Portal |
| dct:source | https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/ |
| rdfs:comment | Interoperable Europe Portal is a collaborative platform on interoperability with the aim: "to provide a common venue that enables public administrations, businesses and citizens to share and reuse IT solutions and good practices, and facilitate communication and collaboration on IT projects across Europe", created by the European Commission and funded by the European Union via the Interoperability solutions for public administrations, businesses and citizens (ISA2) Programme. It can be regarded as an example of proactiveness. |
| dcat:theme | Legal IoP, Organisational IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | Desire |