Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/uncertainty-management |
| dct:title | Uncertainty management |
| dct:description | (Statement) Uncertainty management acknowledges the degree of confidence in decisions made during the analysis and design of Digital Public Services, arising from imperfect, unknown, or partial information. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Uncertainty management is crucial for recognising and managing the inherent limitations in knowledge and information. By acknowledging uncertainty, organisations can make more informed decisions, anticipate potential risks, and develop strategies to mitigate them. This principle helps improve the quality of problem descriptions and solutions by encouraging thorough analysis and consideration of various possible outcomes. Addressing uncertainty enhances the robustness and adaptability of Digital Public Services, ensuring they can effectively operate in partially observable or stochastic environments. |
| dct:description | (Implications) Organisations must adopt practices that recognise and address the limitations in information and knowledge. Business processes should include thorough risk assessments and scenario planning to anticipate and mitigate potential uncertainties. Technically, solutions must be designed to be flexible and adaptable, capable of handling incomplete or evolving information. Continuous monitoring and feedback mechanisms are essential to update and refine solutions as new information becomes available. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Implementation |
| dct:source | Hubbard Decision Research |
| dct:source | https://hubbardresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Decisions-Under-Uncertainty-23-July-2020-PDF.pdf |
| rdfs:comment | The document titled "Decisions Under Uncertainty" by Hubbard Decision Research provides a comprehensive overview of probabilistic models and Monte Carlo methods for decision-making. It emphasises the importance of explicitly modelling uncertainty to improve decision outcomes. The document covers topics such as risk tolerance, the value of information, and the application of Applied Information Economics (AIE) to optimise decisions by focusing measurements where they matter most. |
| dcat:theme | Legal IoP, Organisational IoP, Semantic IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | Desire |