Definition: Social participation refers to Promoting Civic Participation and Transparency of Government Decision-Making Processes covering policies concerning ICT. The usage of digital environments can promote new kinds of sociability, support, and usability or revive certainly lost facets of social ties.The construction of more effective public services, as well as new kinds of communication and interaction between citizens and the various levels of government, can all be facilitated by the use of digital tools. Even more public involvement in various levels of local management processes is possible with their use. These fresh working alliances also contribute to the legitimacy and increased transparency of public activity. Some examples of social participation are:• E-democracy• E-participation• Government-to-citizen (G2C)• Citizen-to-government (C2G)• Citizen-to-citizen (C2C)• Open governance partnership• Grass-root activism and social networking• Political campaigns• Online media• I-voting• Mechanisms: e-petitions, online consultation and crowd-sourcing platforms etc. The implications of social participation are related to the creation and implementation of policies that include as the backbone, the citizens and businesses. Additionally, to policies that govern, it is relevant that public administrations implement tools that foster, enable and ensure stakeholders participation. ""
Source: Digital Democracy of European Citizen Action Service (ECAS)
Source reference: https://ecas.org/digital-democracy/
Last modification: 2024-01-17
Identifier: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/social-participation
EIRA concept: eira:ArchitectureBuildingBlock
ABB name: elap:SocialParticipationPrinciple
Title: Social participation
EIF Layer: N/A
ABB Specialised: eira:EuropeanLibraryofArchitecturePrinciplesPrinciple
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/best-fit-implementation-orientation |
| dct:title | Best fit implementation orientation |
| dct:description | (Statement) The implementation of digital public services has a focus on integration, technology, governance or legal perspective, matching the administration's preference. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Experience shows that a focused approach is a critical success factor in the implementation of digital public services. |
| dct:description | (Implications) An assessment of the context is made prior to the implementation in order to determine the best focus.The priority of the implementation activities is determined by the chosen focus.Use mechanisms provided by the European Commission to plan and align the strategy with real needs. An example is IDPSIO, the IDPSIO (Interoperable Digital Public Services Implementation Orientation) Assessment Tool aims to support digital public service owners in deciding the approach to follow in order to implement their digital public services. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Governance |
| dct:source | COM(2017) 134 final ANNEX 2 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS European Interoperability Framework - Implementation Strategy |
| dct:source | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017DC0134 |
| rdfs:comment | EUR-Lex is your online gateway to EU Law. It provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU legal documents. It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages and is updated daily. |
| dcat:theme | Legal IoP, Organisational IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | N/A |